People v. Overstock.com, Inc.

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 5th 1064·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 588·219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 65
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2017A141613California11,969 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rivera, J.

*1068 Overstock.Com, Inc. (Overstock) appeals a judgment entered after the trial court found it had engaged in unfair business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code, 1 § 17200 et seq. ) and false advertising (§ 17500 et seq.) The court granted injunctive relief and imposed $6,828,000 in civil penalties. Overstock contends

the trial court erred in applying the four-year limitations period of section 17208; that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that Overstock made false and misleading statements in violation of the laws against unfair business practices and false advertising; and that the trial court imposed excessive penalties and improperly ordered injunctive relief. We shall affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Overstock is an online retailer with a stated goal of being an "extreme value" retailer selling products for the lowest prices on the Internet. Overstock was founded in 1999, and originally offered primarily products from businesses that were liquidating excess inventory. Overstock now obtains most of its goods from third party "fulfillment partners."

The product pages on Overstock's website compared the price at which it offered an item to an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.