Laymon

Laymon v. J. Rockcliff, Inc.

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 5th 812·219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2017A147464; A147469California4,615 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Margulies, J.

*815 The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals filed suit against the brokers who represented them in the sale of their homes and a group of companies that provided services in connection with those sales. Plaintiffs contend defendants violated their fiduciary duties by failing to disclose alleged kickbacks paid by the service providers to the brokers in connection with the sales.

Defendants filed motions to compel arbitration of these claims on the basis of three separate agreements, at least one of which was executed by each plaintiff. The trial court found the arbitration clauses in two of the agreements inapplicable, but it compelled the signatories of the third agreement to arbitrate with their brokers. Invoking the doctrine of equitable estoppel, the court also required the signatories of the third agreement to arbitrate their claims against the service providers, who were not parties to the arbitration agreements. Defendants have appealed the court's refusal to compel arbitration with the remaining plaintiffs, while the plaintiffs who were ordered to arbitration have cross-appealed that order.

We reverse the trial court's ruling on the two arbitration clauses it found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.