Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday

Caution
12 Cal. App. 5th 947·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 553·219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 580·2017 WL 2590653
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 2017A147540California5,956 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pollak, J.

*951 Plaintiff Ming-Hsiang Kao was employed by defendant Joy Holiday, a travel tour company. He brought an action alleging, among other things, breach of contract and violation of federal and state statutes regulating wages and overtime pay. After a bench trial, the court ruled against Kao on his breach of contract and statutory claims but awarded damages for unpaid labor under the equitable doctrine of quantum meruit. Defendants appeal the quantum meruit finding and Kao cross-appeals *585 the denial of his statutory claims. We conclude that Kao is entitled to compensation under the wage statutes, making an equitable remedy unnecessary. We shall reverse the judgment and remand for a calculation of statutory damages.

Statement of Facts

Joy Holiday is a tour company based in Millbrae, California that specializes in bus tours across the United States and China for Chinese-speaking *952 travelers. Defendant Joy Express, Inc. is a related company and defendants Jessy Lin and Harry Chen are a married couple who own and operate the companies. Kao is a Taiwanese national who holds a bachelor's degree in management information systems from an English university. Kao was living in Taiwan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.