Morgado

Morgado v. City & Cnty. of S.F.

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 5th 1·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 585·220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 497·2017 WL 2791413
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2017A141681California6,280 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Streeter, J.

*4 Government Code 1 section 3304, subdivision (b), which is part of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (PSOPBRA) (§ 3300 et seq.), provides that "[n]o punitive action ... shall be undertaken by any public agency against any public safety officer ... without providing the public safety officer with an opportunity for administrative appeal."

In this appeal, the City and County of San Francisco (City) seeks review of the trial court's order granting injunctive relief to Paulo Morgado (Morgado), a non-probationary City police officer whose employment was terminated following misconduct findings. The City argues the court erred in finding the City's procedure for disciplining police officers violates section 3304, subdivision (b).

We disagree and will affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On or about March 1, 2008, a citizen with whom Morgado interacted filed a complaint against him with the Office of Citizen Complaints (OCC) of the City's Police Department. 2 Pursuant to its powers granted by the City Charter (see S.F. Charter, § 4.127), the OCC investigated the alleged misconduct and shared its findings and disciplinary recommendations with the chief of police (Chief).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.