In re Taitano
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Needham, J.
*239 Jordan E. Taitano was determined by the trial court to be incompetent to stand trial. His commitment facility subsequently found there was no substantial likelihood he would be restored to mental competence in the foreseeable future, he completed the three-year maximum commitment period, and he was determined not to be subject to a conservatorship as gravely disabled. The trial court granted Taitano a writ of habeas corpus and released him, concluding that Penal Code section 1368 did not authorize a new competency hearing.
*529 1 The People appeal, urging that such a hearing is authorized under section 1368.
In light of the plain language of the statute, the statutory scheme, the statutory purpose, and existing precedent, we conclude that section 1368 does not authorize a new competency hearing in Taitano's circumstances.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In November 2009, an information charged Taitano with murder, robbery, carjacking, attempted kidnapping, first degree burglary, and two counts of reckless evasion of a police officer resulting in great bodily injury. (§§ 187; 211; 212.5, subd. (c); 215; 207, subd. (a); 664/460, subd. (a); Veh. Code, § 2800.3.) During the…