Doe

ZL Techs., Inc. v. Doe

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 5th 603·220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 569
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2017A143680California13,075 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rivera, J.

*607 Plaintiff and appellant ZL Technologies, Inc. (ZL) appeals from an order and judgment dismissing its complaint with prejudice for failure to serve defendants, and from an order denying its motion to compel compliance with the subpoena it served on real party in interest and respondent Glassdoor, Inc. (Glassdoor). ZL contends the trial court erred in denying its motion to compel, prohibiting it from identifying Doe defendants whom it contends anonymously defamed it on Glassdoor's website, and then improperly dismissed its action for failing to serve the same individuals, after denying it access to the information necessary to identify them. We agree and therefore shall reverse the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

According to its complaint, ZL is a California corporation that provides email archiving, eDiscovery, and compliance software and support to businesses throughout the country. Glassdoor operates a website for job seekers on which people may anonymously post information and express opinions regarding current or past employers. Between September 2010 and June 2012, individuals representing themselves as current or former ZL employees posted seven anonymous reviews on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.