Bayliss
United States v. Bayliss
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 201209-16715California427 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK BAYLIS, No. 09-16715
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05791-CRB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MATTHEW CATE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2012** San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, FISHER and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Patrick Baylis appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254
habeas petition based on an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel of his choosing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253,
and we affirm.
1. We assume without deciding that Baylis exhausted his claims and that
his arguments…