Okorie

Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist.

Caution
14 Cal. App. 5th 574·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 712·222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2017B268733California10,067 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Johnson, J.

*580 In 2015, Dioka Okorie (Okorie) sued his employer, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and two of his supervisors, Jacqueline Hughes (Hughes) and Cynthia Jackson (Jackson) (collectively, Defendants), alleging, among other things, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. In response, Defendants filed a special motion to strike the *581 complaint pursuant to section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1 -a so-called anti-SLAPP motion 2 -which the trial court granted.

On appeal, Okorie and his wife, Nkeiru Okorie (collectively, Plaintiffs) advance two principal arguments. First, they contend that the trial court erred in granting the anti-SLAPP motion because the complaint contained allegations regarding both protected and unprotected activities by the Defendants. Second, they argue that the motion should have been denied because they demonstrated a likelihood of success on certain of their causes of action. We disagree with both arguments and, accordingly, affirm.

BACKGROUND

I. Plaintiffs' complaint

According to the complaint, in 2003, LAUSD hired Okorie as a teacher at Westport Heights Elementary School. While at the school, Okorie took on a number of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.