Cohen

City of Anaheim v. Cohen

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 5th 1135·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 753·222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 608
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2017C081918California12,763 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Robie, J.

In this redevelopment case, the city of Anaheim, acting in its capacity as successor to the former Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, sought approval from the California *611 Department of Finance (the department) to obtain money from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (the fund or, sometimes, the RPTTF) to pay back the city of Anaheim for payments the City of Anaheim made to a construction company to complete certain real property improvements that the former Anaheim Redevelopment Agency was obligated to provide on a particular redevelopment project (the packing district project). 1 The city and the city as successor characterized the transaction between themselves as a loan, but the department ultimately denied the claim for money from the fund because the city did not disburse the loan proceeds to the city as successor, but instead paid the construction company directly, and because the city as successor did not obtain prior approval for the "loan" agreement with the city from the oversight board.

Around the same time, the city as successor sought approval from the department to obtain money from the fund to make payments to the Anaheim Housing Authority (the authority)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.