Grotheer

Grotheer v. Escape Adventures, Inc.

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 5th 1283·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 764·222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 633
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2017E063449California8,628 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Slough, J.

*1287 Plaintiff and appellant Erika Grotheer is a non-English speaking German citizen who took a hot air balloon ride in the Temecula *1288 wine country and suffered a fractured leg when the basket carrying her and seven or eight others crash landed into a fence. Grotheer sued three defendants for her injuries: the balloon tour company, Escape Adventures, Inc. (Escape), the pilot and Escape's agent, Peter Gallagher (Gallagher), and Wilson Creek Vineyards, Inc. (Wilson Creek) (collectively, defendants or respondents). Grotheer alleged Escape and Gallagher negligently or recklessly operated the balloon by (1) failing to properly slow its descent during landing and (2) failing to give the passengers safe landing instructions before the launch. Grotheer alleged the hot air balloon company is a common carrier, and as such, owed its passengers a heightened duty of care. ( Civ. Code, § 2100.) Grotheer also alleged Wilson Creek was vicariously liable for Escape and Gallagher's conduct because the vineyard shared a special relationship with the balloon company.

The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing Grotheer could not satisfy the elements of a negligence claim and, even if she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.