Cortez

Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equip. Co.

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 5th 1·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 763·222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 649·2017 WL 3837364
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2017B275255California6,827 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

*4 Gabriel Cortez sued his former employer Doty Bros. Equipment Company for Labor Code and wage and hour violations on behalf of himself and a putative class of employees and former employees. Cortez's complaint included a related representative claim under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) ( Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq. ). On September 19, 2014 the superior court granted Doty Bros.' petition to compel arbitration of Cortez's individual claims pursuant to an arbitration provision in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing his employment and severed and stayed his PAGA claim, which was not subject to arbitration. The court reserved questions concerning the arbitrability of the class claims for the arbitrator. On November 19, 2014 we summarily denied Cortez's petition for a writ of mandate challenging the court's order compelling arbitration.

Cortez and Doty Bros. then stipulated to allow the superior court, rather than the arbitrator, to determine the arbitrability of the class claims. On March 23, 2015, after substantial briefing and a hearing on this question, the court dismissed the class claims as unauthorized under the CBA. On April 1, *5…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.