In re Tyrone A. Miller On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 5th 960·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 741·222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 691
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2017B278902California8,788 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Baker, J.

*963 In August 2002, a jury convicted petitioner Tyrone A. Miller (defendant) of the first degree felony murder of Rene Franco (Franco) ( *964 Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a) ) 1 and the second degree robbery of Ana Saravia (Saravia) (§ 211). Defendant was not the person who shot Franco, nor was he present at the scene when the shooting occurred; instead, he was convicted of murder for aiding and abetting an associate who shot Franco after snatching Saravia's purse. The jury found the killing occurred in the commission of a robbery within the meaning of section 190.2, subdivision (a)(17)(A)-a "special circumstance" that required a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole (§ 190.2, subd. (d)). Years later, our Supreme Court decided People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 , 189 Cal.Rptr.3d 208 , 351 P.3d 330 ( Banks ) and People v. Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522 , 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 407 , 372 P.3d 811 ( Clark ), which discuss when section *693 190.2 authorizes a special circumstance life without parole sentence for a felony-murder defendant convicted as an aider and abettor. We consider whether Banks and Clark , which explain what it means for an aiding and abetting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.