State v. Cont'l Ins. Co.

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 5th 1017·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 846·223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716·2017 WL 4324857
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 2017E064518California10,090 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ramirez, J.

*1022 This is an action by the State of California (State) to recover from various insurers the costs of cleaning up the Stringfellow hazardous waste site. It has been pending since 1993. It has been to this court three times and to the California Supreme Court twice. At this point, however, the only remaining insurers are the Continental Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Company (collectively Continental), and the only remaining issues relate to prejudgment interest.

In 2015, Continental paid the State its full policy limits of $12 million. The trial court ruled that the State was entitled to mandatory prejudgment interest on that amount at seven percent, dating back to 1998, and thus totaling $13,914,082.09. In the alternative, it also ruled that the State was entitled to discretionary prejudgment interest, at seven percent, dating back to 2002, and thus totaling $10,554,082.19.

Continental appeals. In the published portion of this opinion, we address its contentions that the award of mandatory prejudgment interest was erroneous because:

*1023 1. The award was premised on the trial court's erroneous ruling as to when Continental's policies attached.

2. The State was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.