Linton

Linton v. Desoto Cab Co.

Bad Law
15 Cal. App. 5th 1208·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 873·223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 761·2017 WL 4416856
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 5, 2017A146162California10,137 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dondero, J.

*1210 Plaintiff Darnice Linton appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant DeSoto Cab Company. Defendant initiated the trial court *1211 proceeding after the Labor Commissioner found in favor of plaintiff on his claim for unpaid wages. Plaintiff had alleged defendant violated certain wage and hour laws by requiring him to pay a set fee (known as a "gate fee") in exchange for obtaining a taxicab to drive for each of his shifts. After a bench trial, the court concluded plaintiff was not entitled to recover the gate fees because he was an independent contractor and not an employee of defendant. In so ruling, the court determined that several relevant cases, including the Supreme Court's seminal case S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 , 256 Cal.Rptr. 543 , 769 P.2d 399 ( Borello ), are not controlling under the circumstances at issue here. We conclude the court erred in its legal analysis. The judgment is therefore reversed. Our conclusion renders moot defendant's appeal of the court's order denying its claim for costs.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Background

Defendant has a fleet of about 230 taxicabs in San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.