Am. Cargo Express, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 145·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 887·223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 857·82 Cal. Comp. Cases 1115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2017C081125California4,375 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Mauro, J.

*148 The California Self-Insurers' Security Fund (SISF) assumed the workers' compensation obligations of Mainstay Business Solutions (Mainstay), a temporary staffing and employee leasing business, when Mainstay defaulted on its obligations to self-insure. SISF then sued Mainstay, Mainstay's clients and others to recover its costs and liabilities. Among other things, the trial court granted SISF's motion for judgment on the pleadings against Mainstay's clients, finding that SISF stated a cause of action under *149 Labor Code section 3744, subdivision (c), 1 that section 3602, subdivision (d) did not constitute a defense thereto, and that SISF's cause of action was not subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Appeals Board). Mainstay's *859 clients filed a petition for writ of mandate and/or prohibition in this court challenging the trial court's order.

As a threshold procedural matter, SISF contends (1) writ review is not appropriate because the main issue presented has been rendered moot by the enactment of section 3701.9. On the merits, Mainstay's clients contend (2) SISF's claim is subject to the exclusive remedy provisions of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.