Higgins

Higgins v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 5th 973·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 840·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 11
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2017D071353California4,075 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rourke, J.

*975 Francisca Cabandong filed the underlying action in May 2012 and served Shawn Higgins with a summons and third amended complaint in August 2016. In this writ proceeding, petitioner Higgins challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss real party in interest Cabandong's lawsuit on the basis that Cabandong failed to serve Higgins with the summons and complaint within three years of the commencement of the action, as required by the mandatory provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 583.210, subdivision (a). 1 In denying Higgins's motion, the court ruled that the three-year period had not expired, since the action had been stayed from March 13, 2014, when codefendant *13 Ronald Powell filed bankruptcy, until July 29, 2016, when the bankruptcy court granted Cabandong's motion to lift the automatic stay that became effective upon the filing of Powell's bankruptcy.

We issued an order to show cause and now grant the petition. As a matter of law, the automatic stay that applied to claims against debtor Powell did not apply to Cabandong's claims against nondebtor Higgins . Accordingly, the trial court erred in ruling that Powell's bankruptcy stay affected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.