PD Doe v. San Diego-Imperial Council

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 301·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 895·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273·2017 WL 4639245
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2017D070414California4,653 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Aaron, J.

*304 I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff John PD Doe was sexually abused by a Boy Scout master beginning in 1998 and continuing for a number of years at a ranch owned and operated by the defendants, San Diego-Imperial Council and Boy Scouts of America (the defendants). In 2013, many years after the abuse and after Doe obtained psychological therapy, he filed this action against the defendants. The defendants ultimately demurred to Doe's complaint on the ground that he failed to file a certificate of merit, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1 ( section 340.1 ), which applies to actions to recover damages for childhood sexual abuse. The trial court sustained the defendants' demurrer on this ground, without leave to amend. Doe appealed the trial court's judgment, and this court affirmed the judgment in favor of the defendants in Doe v. San Diego-Imperial Council (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th.81, 190 Cal.Rptr.3d 755 ( Doe I ).

Following the issuance of the remittitur, the defendants moved for an award of attorney fees with respect to the fees incurred in defendant Doe's appeal. The defendants sought attorney fees pursuant to subdivision (q) of section 340.1. That provision provides…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.