People v. Gonzales

Bad Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 494·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 919·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421·2017 WL 4769069
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20172d Crim. No. B276101California4,581 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

*496 Here we affirm a judgment involving various counts of Penal Code violations relating to child molestation. The prosecution introduced evidence of uncharged sex offenses defendant committed against the victim through the victim's own testimony, not through the testimony of third parties. ( Evid. Code, § 1108, subd. (a).) Such testimony, though not common, is in accord with established precedent. We are concerned, however, with the relationship between CALCRIM No. 1191, 1 instructing on evidence of uncharged sex offenses against the victim, and Evidence Code 1108. These concerns are well stated in Justice Perren's concurring opinion.

*497 A jury found Richard Gonzales, Jr. guilty of two counts of oral copulation with a child 10 years old or younger ( Pen. Code, §§ 288.7, subd. (b), 2 289 ) (counts 1 and 3); three counts of lewd acts with a child (§ 288, subd. (a)) (counts 2, 4 and 6); and one count of sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or younger ( §§ 288.7, subd. (b), 289 ) (count 5). The jury also found as to counts 2, 4 and 6 that Gonzales had substantial sexual contact with the child. (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(8).)

The trial court sentenced Gonzales to three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.