Buell

People v. Buell

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 682·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 941·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 498·2017 WL 4803869
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2017A144046California3,134 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Kennedy, J.

*685 Appellant Russell Dean Buell appeals from revocation of his mandatory supervision following a felony conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. As a condition of mandatory supervision, Buell was prohibited from drinking alcohol and was required to wear an alcohol monitoring ankle bracelet provided and monitored by a private company. When that company issued a report indicating Buell had consumed alcohol, the People petitioned the *501 trial court to revoke Buell's mandatory supervision. At the hearing on the petition, the prosecution offered the testimony of Buell's probation department case manager, who testified based on the data and conclusion from the monitoring company's report. The trial court revoked Buell's mandatory supervision and sentenced him to serve the rest of his term in county jail. On appeal, Buell argues the trial court's order is not supported by substantial evidence and his counsel was ineffective in failing to object to his case manager's testimony and the company's report under People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 144 , 549 P.2d 1240 ( Kelly ). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.