Baxter

Baxter v. Genworth N. Am. Corp.

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 713·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 936·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 556·2017 WL 4837702
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 2017A144744California9,121 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McGuiness, J.

*718 Plaintiff Maya Baxter sued her former employer, defendant Genworth North America Corporation (Genworth), for wrongful termination and related causes of action arising out of her employment. Genworth moved to compel arbitration of the dispute. On appeal from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration, Genworth contends the trial court erred in concluding the arbitration agreement is unconscionable and in refusing to sever any provisions the court considered to be unconscionable. Because we conclude the arbitration agreement is procedurally and substantively unconscionable, we shall affirm the trial court's order.

*719 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Baxter began working for defendant AssetMark Investment Services, Inc. (AssetMark) in February 2001. Genworth acquired AssetMark in August 2006. As AssetMark transitioned to Genworth, Baxter became an employee of Genworth. As a condition of her continued employment, Genworth required Baxter to sign a "Conditions of Employment Acknowledgment" form. Baxter signed the acknowledgment, *562 which confirmed her receipt and review of certain printed materials and included her agreement to arbitrate any disputes arising out of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.