Francis

People v. Francis

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 876·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 949·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2017B270470California4,122 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Lavin, J.

*879 INTRODUCTION

The Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (the STEP Act) imposes an additional penalty on any defendant who commits a felony to benefit a criminal street gang. The length of the sentence enhancement depends on whether the felony is serious, violent, or non-serious and nonviolent. Defendant Trevaun Ian Francis *658 1 was convicted of a serious felony with gang and gun enhancements. Thus, the gang enhancement for serious felonies applied. Under the circumstances of this case, however, the court could not impose both the gun enhancement and *880 the serious-felony gang enhancement. ( People v. Le (2015) 61 Cal.4th 416 , 189 Cal.Rptr.3d 166 , 351 P.3d 295 ( Le ).) Instead of staying or striking the prohibited enhancement, the court imposed the "other felonies" gang enhancement.

We conclude, based on the plain language of the statute, that the gang enhancement for "other felonies" cannot be appended to a serious or violent felony because serious and violent felonies fall within that provision's excepting clause. We therefore modify the judgment to reflect the serious-felony gang enhancement, stay the enhancement, and affirm as modified.

FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.