Fernandes

Fernandes v. Singh

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 5th 932·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 960·224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751·2017 WL 5076415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 5, 2017C080264California995 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Duarte, J.

*934 Tammy Fernandes successfully sued vexatious litigant Raj Singh and his wife Kiran Rawat individually and as trustees of the Sita Ram-or "Sitaram"-Trust (Trust), for wrongful eviction and related claims. She obtained an award of compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and attorney fees. All defendants filed a joint notice of appeal through counsel. While Rawat and the Trust remain represented by counsel on appeal, Singh now represents himself. 1

On appeal, Rawat claims error in the trial court's denial of her motion to vacate the judgment based on lack of service, and attacks the punitive damage award. Singh also challenges the punitive damage award, disputes *935 service on Rawat, and contends the attorney fee award was excessive. Finding no merit in defendants' claims, we shall affirm.

BACKGROUND

On June 17, 2013, Fernandes sued Singh and Rawat, both as individuals and as trustees of the Trust, alleging (among other theories) breach of the warranty of habitability, conversion of personal property, and wrongful eviction. The lawsuit followed three unlawful detainer complaints filed by defendants after Fernandes exercised her right to complain about the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.