Hoffman
Hoffman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.
Opinion
lead Opinion
Ikola, J.
*1088 The issue in this writ proceeding is whether an information may allege a single offense in a single count, but describe within that count multiple discrete acts, each of which constitute the charged offense. Here, the People have alleged 121 counts of healthcare insurance fraud. ( Pen. Code, § 550, subds. (a)(5), (a)(6).) 1 Each count identifies multiple patient files and a timeframe that spans years. Defendant demurred to the information. The court overruled the demurrer and defendant then filed the present writ petition.
We conclude the information is proper and will deny the writ petition. Each count alleges a single offense. Any complications, or undue prejudice to defendant, arising from the fact that multiple discrete acts may constitute the charged offense in each count are adequately dealt with by a unanimity instruction at trial, or by other tools at the court's disposal, such as a severance of counts, or trial continuances where appropriate. A demurrer on these grounds is not the proper vehicle to address defendant's concerns. The court correctly overruled the demurrer.
FACTS
In May 2011, defendant was indicted on 884 felony counts alleging healthcare insurance…