Whitehall

Whitehall v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 5th 352·225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 321
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2017E065672California5,680 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ramirez, J.

*357 Plaintiff, Mary Anna Whitehall, was a social worker for the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS or the County) who sought legal advice pertaining to any liability she might have for submitting misleading information and doctored photographs to the juvenile court at the direction of her superiors. Her counsel prepared a filing for the juvenile court to apprise it of the falsified information, and plaintiff was immediately placed on administrative leave for disclosing confidential information to an unauthorized person. Upon being informed she would be terminated for the breach, plaintiff resigned her position and filed a whistle blower action against the County. The County filed a special motion to strike the complaint as an Anti-SLAPP action, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 425.16, which was denied by the trial court. The County appealed.

On appeal, the County asserts that the trial court erred in determining that plaintiff had established the second prong of the criteria to overcome a special motion to strike an Anti-SLAPP lawsuit by finding a likelihood she would prevail because the County's actions were not privileged or covered by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.