Watts

People v. Watts

Good Law
225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 565
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2017B270324California7,099 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Johnson, J.

A jury convicted Bobby Watts (Watts) of murder and found that Watts committed the offense for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang. Watts then filed a motion for new trial, alleging the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's true finding on the gang enhancement allegation and that his trial attorney had provided ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, Watts contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion. Watts also contends the trial court erred by precluding him from introducing evidence of the victim's blood alcohol level at the time of his death and that instructing the jury using CALCRIM No. 315 violated his due process rights. We hold that the trial court employed the incorrect test when reviewing *568 Watts's new trial motion with respect to the gang enhancement allegation. We thus reverse the trial court order denying the motion with respect to the gang allegation only. The order is affirmed in all other respects.

BACKGROUND

I. Overview of Charges

The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office charged Watts with one count of murder ( Pen. Code, § 187,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.