Roth

People v. Roth

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 5th 694·225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 762
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2017B271932; B275527California5,129 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Willhite, J.

*696 Defendant James Roth pleaded no contest to, and was convicted of, second degree burglary ( Pen. Code, 1 § 459 ), a felony, based upon his entry into a storage locker with the intent to commit larceny. The trial court imposed sentence, but suspended execution and placed defendant on probation. His probation subsequently was revoked after the car he was driving was stopped by the police, who found methamphetamine in a bag that belonged to his passenger. Before the probation violation hearing was conducted, defendant filed a petition under section 1170.18 (part of the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, which was passed by the voters as Proposition 47), asking the trial court to recall and resentence his conviction as a misdemeanor. The trial court granted the petition (without objection by the prosecutor), imposed a misdemeanor sentence, and placed defendant on summary probation. A month later, the court realized it had made a mistake in *697 granting the petition because defendant's conviction did not qualify for recall under Proposition 47, and therefore the misdemeanor sentence was unauthorized. After providing defendant an opportunity to be heard, the trial court vacated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.