Shahbazian

Shahbazian v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 5th 823·225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 772
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2017B271562California7,192 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Segal, J.

*826 INTRODUCTION

Governments speak. They also petition. And they act in ways that are neither speaking nor petitioning. It is important to distinguish between the three, because Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 ( section 425.16 ) may apply to the first two, but not the third.

This case concerns whether the City of Rancho Palos Verdes properly issued a permit for a fence separating two neighbors. Hossein and Victoria Shahbazian challenged the permit by suing the City. The Shahbazians alleged the City violated certain ordinances and selectively applied others in issuing the permit for the fence while denying a permit for a deck the Shahbazians had built. The City filed a special motion to strike under section 425.16, arguing the Shahbazians' complaint targeted "protected speech" because the City's decisions followed official government proceedings. The trial court denied the motion, and the City appealed.

We conclude section 425.16 does not protect a governmental entity's decisions to issue or deny permits, and we agree with the trial court that granting a special motion to strike in these circumstances would chill citizens' attempts to challenge government action.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.