Cima-Sorci
Cima-Sorci v. Sorci
Opinion
lead Opinion
Blease, J.
*878 Tyson S. Sorci (Father) appeals from an order confirming the registration of an Italian child and spousal support order pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) (former Fam. Code, § 4900 et seq. ). 1 Under UIFSA, a support order of a foreign country may be registered for enforcement in California if the foreign country "has enacted a *879 law or established procedures for issuance and enforcement of support orders which are substantially similar to the procedures under [UIFSA]." (§ 4901, subd. (s)(2); § 4951, subd. (a).)
On appeal, Father contends that the trial court (1) "misallocated to Father the burden of proving that Italy is not a state under UIFSA," (2) "improperly deprived Father of an evidentiary hearing to refute the notion that Italy is such a state," (3) "erroneously refused to render a statement of decision," and (4) "erred as a matter of law in concluding that Italy is a state under UIFSA." We shall conclude that Father's contentions lack merit and will affirm the trial court's order.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Father, a United States citizen, and Daniela Cima-Sorci (Mother), an Italian citizen, met in Italy while Father was…