People v. N. River Ins. Co.

Bad Law
18 Cal. App. 5th 863·227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 243
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2017B271421California6,404 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hoffstadt, J.

*867 After a criminal defendant failed to appear at his arraignment, the trial court forfeited the bail bond and thereafter denied the bail surety's motion to vacate that forfeiture. The surety has appealed. Its appeal presents three questions. First, may a trial court grant a second extension of the statutory "appearance period" (the period in which a surety may return the defendant or seek vacatur of the forfeiture) more than 180 days after it has granted a first extension? Second, may a trial court grant a motion to vacate the forfeiture of a bail bond on a ground not asserted and on evidence not presented to the court until after the appearance period has expired? Lastly, is a surety entitled to vacatur of the forfeiture of a bail bond on the basis of permanent or temporary "disability" under Penal Code section 1305, subdivisions (d) and (e), 1 respectively, when the defendant charged with trafficking narcotics has voluntarily fled the country and is consequently barred from reentry under federal immigration law due to the pending charges? We hold that the answer to all three questions is "no," and affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Facts

In mid-June 2014, police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.