Stirling

Stirling v. Brown

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 5th 1144·227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 645
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2018G053998California5,228 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

*1147 INTRODUCTION

The California Military Whistleblower Protection Act, Military and Veterans Code section 56 ( Section 56 ), affords certain rights and protections to service members of the California National Guard who face actual or threatened adverse personnel actions in retaliation for reporting waste, fraud, abuse of authority, violation of law, or threats to the public health and safety. A service member may file an allegation that a prohibited personnel action has been taken. The allegation is filed with the state inspector general, who must expeditiously determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conduct an investigation and, if so, expeditiously conduct an investigation and prepare a report on the results.

Under Section 56, subdivision (e) ( Section 56(e) ), if the inspector general is not outside the immediate chain of command of both the service member submitting the allegation and the individual or individuals alleged to have taken the challenged personnel action, then the inspector general must refer the allegation to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Governor. At *1148 issue in this case is the scope of the Governor's responsibilities upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.