City of Modesto v. Dow Chem. Co.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 130·227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 764
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2018A134419California11,995 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rivera, J.

*135 I. INTRODUCTION

In late 1998, the City of Modesto (the City), the City of Modesto Sewer District No. 1 (the Sewer District) and the Modesto Redevelopment Agency (the RDA) sued various retail dry cleaning businesses (dry cleaners) operating in Modesto together with *767 the manufacturers of dry cleaning equipment used at those dry cleaners, and the manufacturers and distributors of dry cleaning solvent. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants had caused the City's groundwater, sewer system and easements, and the soil of property located within the project area of the RDA, to become contaminated with perchloroethylene (PCE), a "toxic chlorinated solvent[ ]." Plaintiffs sought recovery for the past, present and future costs of investigation and remediation of the contamination at numerous sites under multiple legal theories.

This action has engendered nearly 14 years of litigation, including three detours to this court, and five trial phases. A final judgment was entered in November of 2011, and an amended judgment in May 2012. To the extent it can be summarized in one sentence, the judgment awarded plaintiffs damages with respect to three dry cleaning sites, including an award of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.