Alameda Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda Cnty. Employees' Ret. Assn.

Bad Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 61·227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 787
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2018A141913California27,978 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Reardon, J.

*75 This consolidated action arises out of the tension between two undeniably valid, and yet fundamentally opposed, public interests: the interest of the government in maintaining the flexibility to alter statutes to conform to current needs and the interest of public employees in a stable and predictable pension, earned through years of public service. On September 12, 2012, Governor Brown-faced with a statewide crisis involving the significant underfunding of public pension systems-signed into law the Public Employee Pension Reform Act of 2013 and related legislation (interchangeably, PEPRA, the Pension Reform Act, or AB 197) in an attempt to curb what were seen as pervasive abuses in public pension systems throughout California, including those governed by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL), Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq. 1 ( § 7522 et seq. ; Stats. 2012, chs. 296 & 297; see *792 Marin Assn. of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Assn. (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 674 , 680-683, 206 Cal.Rptr.3d 365 ( Marin ), review granted Nov. 22, 2016, S237460.) Various public employees and public employee organizations in Alameda, Contra Costa, and Merced Counties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.