Khan

Khan v. Dunn-Edwards Corp.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 804·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 90
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2018B270382California1,840 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sortino, J.

*92 *806 This lawsuit is brought pursuant to Labor Code section 2698, the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). We affirm the summary judgment because plaintiff Hamid H. Khan failed to provide adequate notice of his claim to the relevant agency prior to bringing the lawsuit against his former employer Dunn-Edwards Corporation (Dunn-Edwards).

BACKGROUND

Khan worked at Dunn-Edwards from September 6, 1994, to September 2, 2011. During normal pay periods, all of Khan's wage statements included the pay period start date. Khan never looked at his wage statements. His payments were deposited directly into his bank account. Khan received his final paycheck on September 13, 2011. In contrast to all other wage statements, Khan's final wage statement did not include the start date for the pay period.

1. Initial Complaint

In January 2012, Khan sued Dunn-Edwards for receiving his pay check 11 days after his termination, allegedly in violation of Labor Code sections 201 through 203. He purported to sue on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and alleged that he could establish the prerequisites for a class action lawsuit.

2. Khan's PAGA Notice

On February 28,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.