Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 789·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 228
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2018C081266California4,911 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Renner, J.

*793 Cross-complainants and appellants Centex Homes and Centex Real Estate Corporation (Centex) and cross-defendant and respondent St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) have a history of insurance coverage disputes. This particular dispute arises out of construction defect litigation between certain Rocklin homeowners and Centex, the developer of their homes. St. Paul was an insurer for subcontractor Ad Land Venture (Ad Land), and agreed to defend Centex as an additional insured subject to a reservation of rights. Centex filed a cross-complaint against its subcontractors and St. Paul that sought, as the seventh cause of action, a *794 declaration that Centex was entitled to independent counsel under Civil Code section 2860 1 because St. Paul's reservation of rights created significant conflicts of interest. 2

Centex appeals from a final judgment after the trial court granted St. Paul's motion for summary adjudication of Centex's seventh cause of action. Centex argues any possible or potential conflict is legally sufficient to require St. Paul to provide independent counsel. We disagree. Alternatively, Centex contends independent counsel was required because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.