Gaynor

Gaynor v. Bulen

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 864·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 243
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2018D070907California9,197 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haller, J.

*869 Appellant James Bulen (James) and respondents (the Gaynor beneficiaries) 1 are extended family members who are cobeneficiaries of a trust (Trust) created by their grandfather or great-grandfather (Grandfather). Years after Grandfather's death, these individuals and others engaged in contentious disputes over the management and control of the Trust.

After the probate court resolved these disputes, the Gaynor beneficiaries filed a surcharge petition against the cotrustees, and later added James as a respondent based on his alleged de facto trustee status. The Gaynor beneficiaries alleged a single breach of fiduciary duty cause of action, claiming the cotrustees and James took numerous actions to benefit themselves at the expense of the other beneficiaries. One of those actions involved distributing Trust funds only to themselves and other senior beneficiaries. Another action involved a plan to modify the Trust terms to create new trustee succession rules ensuring the cotrustees' (and James's) continued control over the Trust distributions. The Gaynor beneficiaries alleged that in implementing this latter plan, James and the cotrustees wrongfully withdrew trust assets and then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.