Becerra

Becerra v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 967·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 327
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2017C085670California4,624 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Raye, J.

*970 Petitioner the Attorney General of the State of California seeks a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate its order requiring that he rescind the circulating title and summary he prepared for a proposed 2018 ballot initiative measure to repeal portions of Senate Bill *971 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, and replace it with the title and summary approved by the court. 1 *329 Respondent court ruled the circulating materials prepared by the Attorney General are confusing, misleading, and likely to create prejudice against the proposed measure.

After the Attorney General filed his writ petition in this court, and initial opposition was filed by the real party in interest Travis Allen, we issued an order to preserve our jurisdiction, staying respondent court's ruling and any proceedings thereon, pending further order of this court. We also informed the parties that we were considering the issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance, and invited further opposition. (See Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 626 , 681 P.2d 893 .) The parties urged the court to resolve the issues on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.