Cal. Self-Insurers' Sec. Fund v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 1065·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 546
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2018G054981California5,208 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Moore, J.

*548 *1068 Petitioners California Self-Insurers' Security Fund (the Fund) and Nixon Peabody LLP (Nixon Peabody or the firm) seek a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order disqualifying Nixon Peabody from representing the Fund in the instant case. Petitioners argue the trial court mistakenly believed it was compelled by law to disqualify the firm; the court instead should have made further factual findings and exercised its discretion. Real parties in interest contend disqualification was mandatory and therefore no discretion needed to be exercised.

We conclude, for the reasons set forth below, that automatic disqualification was not required under these facts. We therefore grant the petition and direct the trial court to determine whether confidential information was transmitted to Nixon Peabody, or whether, in the court's discretion, other compelling reasons dictate the firm should be disqualified.

*1069 I

FACTS

The Fund is a nonprofit organization charged by the state Legislature with continuing payment of workers' compensation claims when a self-insured entity is unable to do so. ( Lab. Code, § 3740.) When the Fund steps in to provide such payments, it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.