Med. Acquisition Co. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 5th 313·228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 654
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2018D072509California6,055 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

*318 This eminent domain case presents a novel issue regarding a defendant's postjudgment withdrawal of an increased deposit made by the condemning agency. Below, the condemning agency, Tri-City Healthcare District (Tri-City), made a pretrial deposit of $4.7 million and sought to take immediate possession of the subject *656 property, a partially completed medical building. Medical Acquisition Company, Inc. (MAC) stipulated to Tri-City's possession of the building and withdrew the $4.7 *319 million deposited under the "quick-take" provision of the California Constitution (see Cal. Const., art. I, § 19, subd. (a)) and Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1255.010.

The eminent domain case was consolidated with another case involving a lease between the parties and ultimately proceeded to trial where a jury determined just compensation for the taking was nearly $17 million. The court subsequently ordered Tri-City to increase its deposit by about $12.2 million. Among other procedural maneuvers, Tri-City filed a notice of abandonment of the eminent domain proceeding. However, the superior court granted MAC's motion to set aside the abandonment. Tri-City has appealed that order in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.