Catherine Prouse v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Good Law
469 F. App'x 631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 201209-72118California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Catherine Anne Prouse, a native and citizen of Canada and a legal permanent resident of the United States, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that Prouse’s conviction under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 453.321 for supplying methamphetamine to minors qualifies as an “aggravated felony” under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Applying the modified categorical approach, we agree with the BIA that Prouse’s Nevada conviction constitutes an “aggravated felony.” See United States v. Aguila-Montes de Oca, 655 F.3d 915, 940 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc). Aggravated felonies include drug trafficking crimes. 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B). A drug trafficking crime is any felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(2).

The CSA makes it a crime to “distribute” a controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Prouse’s Nevada conviction for supplying methamphetamine is the equivalent of this federal crime. First, methamphetamine is a controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. § 812 (c). The distribution of any quantity of methamphetamine is punishable under the CSA. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (b)(l)(A)(viii), (B)(viii), (C). Second,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.