Hauser

Hauser v. Ventura Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors

Good Law
20 Cal. App. 5th 572·229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20182d Civil No. B276903California2,737 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

*574 This case calls to mind the poem "The Tyger" from Songs of Experience by William Blake, the last stanza of which reads: "Tyger! Tyger! Burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Dare frame thy fearful symmetry!"

Irena Hauser applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) to keep up to five tigers on her property. The county planning commission and board of supervisors denied her application. She petitioned the trial court for a writ of administrative mandate. She appeals the trial court's denial of the petition. We affirm and decide, among other *161 things, that substantial evidence supports the findings of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors (Board).

FACTS

Hauser submitted an application to the County of Ventura (County) for a CUP to keep up to five tigers on her 19-acre property. The property is located in an unincorporated area of the County near the City of Malibu. The project would include three tiger enclosures, a 13,500-square-foot arena with a roof over 14 feet in height at its highest point. It would be surrounded by an eight-foot-high chain link fence encompassing over seven acres.

Hauser's property is located within a half-mile of 57…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.