Inversiones Papaluchi S.A.S. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.

Good Law
20 Cal. App. 5th 1055·229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 701
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2018B285092California3,842 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Kriegler, J.

*1060 A helicopter crash in Colombia on July 12, 2011, killed the pilot and passenger. The surviving heirs filed a wrongful death action against Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Rolls-Royce Corporation. Robinson Helicopter, Honeywell, and Rolls-Royce (collectively, cross-complainants) subsequently filed nearly identical cross-complaints against a Colombian entity and Roes 1-25. Each cross-complainant later designated petitioners Inversiones Papaluchi S.A.S. and Inversiones Protech S.A.S. (collectively, petitioners) as Roe cross-defendants.

Petitioners challenge the respondent court's order denying their motion to quash service of summons and dismiss the cross-complaints. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10, subd. (c).) 1 An alternative writ was issued directing the respondent court to vacate its order, or to show cause before this court why relief sought in the petition should not be granted. The respondent court elected not to comply with the alternative writ. Honeywell and Rolls-Royce filed a joint return, Robinson Helicopter filed a joinder to the return, and petitioners filed a reply. 2

The issues before this court are whether: (1) Robinson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.