Rhinehart

People v. Rhinehart

Good Law
20 Cal. App. 5th 1123·229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2018A148548California2,892 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Siggins, J.

*1125 Defendant and appellant Liam Rhinehart pled no contest to one felony count of carrying a dirk or dagger and one misdemeanor count of exhibiting a deadly weapon. The trial court suspended his sentence and placed him on three years' probation. Rhinehart appeals probation conditions which ordered him to "[s]tay out of places where alcohol is the primary item of sale, such as bars or liquor stores;" to "[b]e of good conduct and obey all laws;" and to "not be adjacent to any school campus during school hours unless [he is] enrolled or with prior permission of school Administration or probation." In order to address any possible vagueness, we modify the last condition to specify that he must maintain a 50-foot distance from any school campus. We otherwise affirm as modified.

BACKGROUND

In August 2015, Rhinehart entered a frozen yogurt shop in Santa Rosa and started to harass a group of children. When a shop employee asked him to leave, Rhinehart refused. Watching his exchange with an employee, a customer thought Rhinehart was positioning himself to attack the employee. The customer stepped between the two and joined in asking Rhinehart to leave.

*1126 Rhinehart made his way…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.