Doyle

Doyle v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Good Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 33·229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 840
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2018G054197California2,076 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Moore, J.

*35 "O thou invisible spirit of wine, if thou hast no name to be known by, let us call thee devil!" (Shakespeare, Othello, act II, scene 3.)

Yea verily, we are presented with a most unfortunate tale of a villainous wine dealer who sold millions of dollars' worth of counterfeit wine to an unsuspecting wine collector. When the wine collector discovered the fraud, he filed an insurance claim based on his "Valuable Possessions" property insurance policy. The insurance company denied the claim. The wine collector sued for breach of contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the insurance company, sustaining its demurrer.

We agreeth with the trial court; the wine collector suffered a financial loss, but there was no loss to property that was covered by the property insurance *36 policy. In other words, the wine collector is stuck with the devil wine without recompense. A Shakespearean tragedy, to be sure.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

David Doyle is a collector of rare, vintage wine. His "world-class" wine collection is housed in a wine storage facility in Laguna Beach. Starting in 2007, Doyle insured his wine collection against loss or damage by purchasing a "Valuable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.