Diaz

People v. Diaz

Good Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 538·230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 499
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2018F071348California2,883 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Detjen, J.

*541 INTRODUCTION

Turlock Hernan Diaz and Daniel Pantoja (Diaz and Pantoja, respectively; collectively, defendants) were charged, together with J.P., with murder ( Pen. Code, 1 *501 § 187, subd. (a) ; count I) and attempted carjacking (§§ 215, subd. (a), 664; count II). As to both counts, it was alleged the crime was committed for the benefit of or in association with a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1) ), and that a principal personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, proximately causing great bodily injury or death (§ 12022.53, subds. (d), (e)(1) ).

Pantoja's motion to sever trials was granted, and dual juries were empaneled, one for Pantoja's trial and the other for the trial of Diaz and J.P. J.P. was acquitted. As to count I, Diaz was convicted of first degree murder committed during the commission of an attempted carjacking. 2 As to count II, Diaz was convicted of attempted carjacking. The jury found the gang enhancement allegation not true, but the firearm discharge allegation true. Pantoja was similarly convicted on counts I and II, but his jury was unable to reach a unanimous finding on the enhancement allegations. Those allegations subsequently were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.