Hayes

Hayes v. Temecula Valley Unified Sch. Dist.

Good Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 735·230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 576
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2018D072998California7,726 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haller, J.

*738 Karen Hayes appeals a judgment denying her writ of mandate petition seeking an order directing the Temecula Valley School District (District) to reinstate her as a middle school principal. The District removed Hayes as principal and reassigned her to a teaching position for the 2015-2016 school year under its statutory authority to reassign a school principal without cause. ( Ed. Code, § 44951.) 1 The District also placed Hayes on paid administrative leave through the end of the 2014-2015 school year.

Hayes primarily challenges her release and reassignment from her school principal position and, to a lesser extent, her placement on paid administrative leave for about three months. She contends the court erred in denying her writ petition because: (1) the District's notice of the no-cause reassignment was untimely as the governing school board (Board) did not approve the notice until two days after the March 15 statutory deadline ( § 44951 ); (2) her removal was in fact "for cause" and therefore she was entitled to a hearing and due process before the removal and reassignment; and (3) her placement on paid administrative leave violated statutes and internal District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.