Wilson

Wilson v. S. Cal. Edison Co.

Good Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 786·230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 595
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2018B275845California9,484 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Willhite, J.

*789 This case is before us for the second time. It involves a homeowner-plaintiff Simona Wilson-who bought a house next door to an electrical substation (the Topaz substation) operated by defendant Southern California Edison Company (Edison). After remodeling her master bathroom four years after she moved into the house, Wilson felt low levels of electricity in her remodeled shower when she adjusted the showerhead. This flow of electricity was *598 due to neutral-to-earth voltage (NEV), also referred to as stray voltage, on her property. Because NEV is unavoidable in a grounded electrical system, such as the one operated by Edison, Edison was unable to completely eliminate it from Wilson's property as Wilson insisted, although it recommended ways to reduce the voltage in her shower to below-perceptible levels. Fearing for her safety and the safety of her three children, Wilson moved out of the house into a rental property. Because she could not afford to pay both the rent on that property and the mortgage on her house, the house went into foreclosure, ruining her credit.

Wilson sued Edison for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), and nuisance, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.