N.S.

N.S. v. D.M.

Bad Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 1040·231 Cal. Rptr. 3d 67
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2018D071305California5,650 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dato, J.

*1045 In this complex custody proceeding involving two states and three different venues, N.S. (Mother) appeals the denial of her motion to recover attorney's fees, travel expenses, and childcare costs from D.M. (Father) associated with the parties' litigation in Santa Clara County and Illinois. She claims she incurred expenses in both places to challenge Father's Illinois petitions and return the custody case to Santa Clara County, where the initial custody determination was made. On appeal, she argues the trial court erred in denying expenses under Family Code sections 7605, subdivision (a) and section 3452, subdivision (a). 1 As we explain, Mother is not entitled to recover expenses under section 3452, but she may seek a need-based fee and cost award under section 7605. We therefore vacate the order and remand for the trial court to consider her request under that statute.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2

Mother and Father were never married and are the parents of two minor children. They separated and in September 2012 filed a Stipulation and Order for Custody and/or Visitation of Children in Santa Clara County agreeing to joint legal and physical custody with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.