Dillard

People v. Dillard

Good Law
21 Cal. App. 5th 1205·231 Cal. Rptr. 3d 106
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2018A141998California8,281 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Simons, J.

*109 *1209 Nanette Sheree Dillard and Paul Daniels appeal their convictions, following a jury trial, of crimes related to their work at an anti-poverty *1210 agency, the Associated Community Action Program (ACAP or the Agency). We conclude two of appellants' convictions were preempted by federal law and reverse these convictions. We otherwise affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Dillard and Daniels were charged by amended information with the following:

Count 1: Conspiracy to commit grant theft by false pretenses ( Pen. Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 487, subd. (a) ) 1 , with overt acts of drafting, signing, and delivering a letter to the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) "falsely attesting" that ACAP had more than $426,000 in " 'non-federal match funds' " in a Citibank account, and sending a draft of such a letter to a Citibank manager.

Count 2: Grand theft by false pretenses ( § 487, subd. (a) ) by unlawfully taking grant funds from HHS. This count included an allegation that the property taken exceeded $200,000 (§ 12022.6, subd. (a)(2) ).

Count 3: Making a false account of public moneys (§ 424, subd. (a)(3) ) by signing and sending false and inaccurate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.