Fierro

Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc.

Good Law
23 Cal. App. 5th 325·232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 651
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2018D071904California6,721 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Irion, J.

*654 *328 Plaintiff Jorge Fierro filed the underlying action against defendant Landry's Restaurant Inc., 1 seeking remedies for what Fierro alleges to be Landry's' violations of specified California labor laws and wage orders. Fierro asserts claims on behalf of himself and on behalf of a class of individuals that he alleges is similarly situated. Landry's demurred to the complaint on the basis that each of the causes of action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

As to Fierro's individual claims, the trial court overruled the demurrer, concluding that the statute of limitations defense did not appear affirmatively on the face of the complaint. As to the class claims, the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend on the basis that a prior class action with identical class claims against Landry's had been dismissed for failure to bring the case to trial in five years as required by Code of Civil Procedure 2 sections 583.310 and 583.360. 3 Under the "death knell" doctrine, Fierro appeals from that portion of the order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer to the class claims. 4

*329 The trial court erred. As we explain, from the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.