Alexander

Alexander v. Scripps Mem'l Hosp. La Jolla

Good Law
23 Cal. App. 5th 206·232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 733
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2018D071001California13,057 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haller, J.

*212 This case raises issues concerning the legal obligations imposed on health care providers when a patient's health care directives conflict with the providers' opinions that the requested care would be medically ineffective and may cause harm. Elizabeth Alexander, a 70-year-old woman suffering from end-stage terminal pancreatic cancer, died four days after she was transferred from a skilled nursing facility to Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla (Scripps). Elizabeth had an advance health care directive stating she wanted all measures taken to prolong her life. Defendants *738 declined to provide Elizabeth with certain advanced life support measures on the basis that such measures would have been ineffective and caused her to suffer further harm.

After Elizabeth's death, her estate (Estate) and children, Clenton Alexander, Christopher Alexander, and Jacquelyn McDermet (together, Plaintiffs), 1 sued Scripps and numerous medical professionals, alleging Elizabeth died after defendants failed to provide the life-sustaining treatment and comfort care requested in her advance health care directive. The trial court resolved Plaintiffs' claims in favor of Defendants either by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.